The Royalty Syndrome

In last Tuesday’s installment of his weekly series, Managing the Meanies, Buck Hamilton introduced us to his first classic low self-esteemer bad boss. This week, Buck defines the Royalty Syndrome, a terrible and unfortunately all too common bad boss affliction…

overconfidentA common trait with many of the de-motivators that I have worked for is that they suffered from royalty syndrome, a terrible bad-boss affliction and one that always promotes poor morale amongst those unfortunate subjects who have to work under such a regime. One such manager I reported to was the king, at least in his mind, while the rest of us – those either at his level or below – were the little people. The guy embraced the policy that if he showed us any respect, he’d be empowering us, and to him that would have been a chink in his armor, a vulnerability. He was the kind of guy who wouldn’t rise to shake your hand. His management style was to diminish his subordinates by putting them in the proverbial frying pan during presentations, dancing for his amusement until he finally found fault. He’d work them over with interrogative skill to the point of exhaustion. Then the whole abusive process would start all over again. The worst part – during presentations, he’d be busy doing some other unrelated task; scrolling through reports on his computer, writing email or listening to his voice mail messages.

“Okay, who’s the first one that wants to step out and take a beating?”

Do you recognize the message here? “I’m the king and you’re an insignificant minion.” It was exhausting to any of us who experienced it but I can assure you that the higher ups, the guys managing at the top, never saw this side of him and the absolutely destructive management style that he practiced. This guy was an outright cancer on the company, perhaps one of the single reasons why the company failed, but no one of influence recognized this fact. To anyone that he perceived to be above him however, he presented an entirely different picture.

This same abusive tyrant was the company’s vice president of sales, and being in such a high profile capacity, really the single guy most responsible for the health of the business and its progress foreword. He scheduled bi-monthly sales conference calls and all of us were expected to contribute input. The trouble was that when asked to contribute no one would venture to speak for fear of being tongue-lashed and ridiculed. I’m serious when I say that this guy would entice the first victim into contributing some remarks and then would proceed to rip him or her to shreds. As such we would witness agonizingly long silent periods during the call, very awkward episodes where not one of us would speak for fear of having our heads bitten off. It was almost as if he had us all lined up and with a bat in his hand said “Okay, who’s the first one that wants to step out and take a beating?” As with other bad leaders that I have encountered in the past, I often wondered about just where and from whom this horrible manager learned to develop his demolishing, de-motivating style.

Next Tuesday: The Formative Years

Buck Hamilton is a sales and marketing executive who’s spent over thirty years working in the paper distribution business. He’s a prolific writer who’s presently working on a book which narrates the stories of sixteen Vietnam War veterans. You can read his weekly series  “Managing the Meanies: A Survival Guide” every Tuesday here on Really Bad Boss.

Be Sociable, Share!
  • Buck Hamilton

    Jim,
    Thanks, too, for your positive remarks. You prompted me to think of yet another gem in my past, a manager who I once worked with whose style was to keep everyone on the team stressed, agitated and each other's throats. He actaully confided in me that he thought that people's performances were at their pinnacle when there was in-fighting and ruthless back biting, a toxic environment that he intentionally created and fueled. In “Why Leaders Fail”, John Baker recently wrote about such chaos within an organization…”operating this way is unsustainable and insane”. How very true, yet the madness continues.
    Buck Hamilton

  • Buck Hamilton

    Sophia,
    Thanks for your remarks and for taking the time to comment. Denise will be posting more of Managing the Meanies over the month or so…visit again on Tuesday.
    Buck Hamilton

  • Buck Hamilton

    Jim,
    Thanks, too, for your positive remarks. You prompted me to think of yet another gem in my past, a manager who I once worked with whose style was to keep everyone on the team stressed, agitated and each other's throats. He actaully confided in me that he thought that people's performances were at their pinnacle when there was in-fighting and ruthless back biting, a toxic environment that he intentionally created and fueled. In “Why Leaders Fail”, John Baker recently wrote about such chaos within an organization…”operating this way is unsustainable and insane”. How very true, yet the madness continues.
    Buck Hamilton

  • Buck Hamilton

    Sophia,
    Thanks for your remarks and for taking the time to comment. Denise will be posting more of Managing the Meanies over the month or so…visit again on Tuesday.
    Buck Hamilton

  • Jim McD

    Some very inciteful writing here, Buck. Here are some further thoughts on the subject: Bullies are valued by senior management because bullies are believed to be more successful in advancing leadership's agenda. I know, it's incomprehensible, but the tendency is to appoint a tyrant in order to ensure getting things done. Furthermore, being kind and respectful to people (at least in the minds of the bullies) suggests that you, the bully-tyrant, are not very bright. Conversely, being cold, distant, ruthless and socially aloof says that you're very intelligent. Kind people are not perceived as being intelligent…it's a ridiculous concept, but indeed true in our culture. Jim McD

  • Jim McD

    Some very inciteful writing here, Buck. Here are some further thoughts on the subject: Bullies are valued by senior management because bullies are believed to be more successful in advancing leadership's agenda. I know, it's incomprehensible, but the tendency is to appoint a tyrant in order to ensure getting things done. Furthermore, being kind and respectful to people (at least in the minds of the bullies) suggests that you, the bully-tyrant, are not very bright. Conversely, being cold, distant, ruthless and socially aloof says that you're very intelligent. Kind people are not perceived as being intelligent…it's a ridiculous concept, but indeed true in our culture. Jim McD

  • http://www.commoninterviewquestions.org/ Sophia Hudson

    This is really a great post.I enjoyed reading it a lot.I think this is very informative and we can learn a lot about royalty syndrome.

  • http://www.commoninterviewquestions.org/ Sophia Hudson

    This is really a great post.I enjoyed reading it a lot.I think this is very informative and we can learn a lot about royalty syndrome.